The UN wants to replace the population of the United States

And Europe and Japan and Korea and Russia.  It will all work out.  After all, Europe and the United States aren’t prosperous societies because of the people and culture that have lived and developed in these places over centuries.  It’s all magic dirt or something.  Import someone from East Timor to Green Bay and they’re instantly as American as apple pie and will grow the economy and everything will be fucking awesome.

the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

And if you have any concerns about millions of Africans, Asians, and “Latin” Americans moving into your country, state, city, or neighborhood, then you’re just a racist deplorable who needs to be replaced.

The population of the United States has tripled in the past 100 years.  So obviously it needs to triple again in even less time.  It needs to keep growing forever.  I mean that’s just an unquestionable gospel truth.  The end.

 

Good for Trump

He backed out of the Paris Accord on Climate Change.  I support the decision so that obviously means the following things about me are true:

I am a climate denier.  I deny that there is a climate.

I hate the environment. I want to destroy it.

I love pollution.

I want people to die.

I am racist.

The most important thing in the world to me is that oil companies make big profits.

I hate “renewable energy.”

I don’t believe in science.

Did I miss anything?

By the way, all of this is symbolic.  These non-binding “accords” and “protocols” to combat “climate change” do nothing to reduce carbon emissions.  They are an excuse in Europe to raise taxes on energy, and in the United States to issue more environmental regulations that favor certain businesses, but no country ever meets the ridiculous targets.  Is there anyone who believes that carbon emissions in 2025 were actually going to be 1/4 of what they were in 2005 just because some president signed a piece of paper in 2016?

Remember the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 that Bill Clinton signed, but never even attempted to have ratified by the Senate?

“You have to judge Kyoto to have been a failure. Just on the merits of what was done as a result of the agreement and countries not actually living up to their commitments or staying with the agreement,”

 

Anti-Russian hysteria

What started as an effort to hurt the candidacy of Donald Trump by claiming he was a Russian “puppet” or “agent’ in 2016 has turned into an all-out campaign of hate against America’s former cold war adversary.  This is a country, that despite being relatively impoverished by Western standards, and having zero ability to attack the United States without committing instant suicide, is still a significant power in the world.  They can have a major impact on their region of the globe in both Europe and Asia through their control of resources and a military presence in their near abroad.

The effort on the part of the media, Democrat Party, and the Neocon wing of the GOP to turn Russia into a pariah state like they have with Iran, Cuba, North Korea, etc. could be a disaster.  Remember, while those regimes have survived despite the hardships imposed on their citizens by US sanctions, efforts to demonize Mao’s China lead to the Korean War, and efforts to demonize Saddam Hussein lead to two disastrous wars in the Middle East in recent decades.  Muammar Gaddafi in Lybia and  Manuel Noriega in Panama both lead to full scale wars and the overthrow or their governments.  Attemps at overthrowing Bashar al-Assad in Syria has lead to the rise of ISIS.

Try isolating and overthrowing Putin and see what happens.  It won’t be pretty.

Why the center left hates Trump more than other Republicans

Good article by Jeff Tucker (not always a huge fan), on the Trump Derangement Syndrome currently afflicting those on the center Left.  Trump is unintentionally destroying people’s faith in the sanctity of the American State.  He’s not doing this by actually attacking the government.  In fact the government will almost certainly continue to grow under his administration.  No, it’s because of this:

he is ruining the mystery of the state, and thereby discrediting their holy institutions.

Your tax dollars at work

The NSA created a hacking method which was stolen and used to wreak worldwide havoc yesterday, shutting down computer systems for hospitals, private companies, and foreign governments.  The hackers demanded ransom from millions of people all over the globe if they wanted to regain access to their computers.

So even though this couldn’t have happened without the NSA designing cyber weapons to potentially terrorize people all over Earth, I think it’s clear we need to invest more heavily in the secretive NSA so they can continue developing these weapons to protect us against the evil Russians.

How bad will Trump be?

I’m holding out hope he’ll be sort of a Ronald Reagan type.  Reagan isn’t the God-like figure that many Fox News watching conservatives think he was.  He was pretty bad in a lot of ways.  In fact I’d say he was probably worse than his predecessor, the much maligned Jimmy Carter.  Perhaps I’ll get into this topic more in a future post.

Still, Reagan was somewhat of a mixed bag while everyone who has followed him has been pretty much all bad.  The political class thought Reagan was a loose cannon who would start WWIII.  Trump was thought by some (including me) to be more of a realist on foreign policy, but he’s started out his presidency basically threatening every foreign country on the Neocon/Hillary Clinton enemies list.  So now a lot of Libertarians and paloeconservatives at least, thinks he’s a mad man too.

As an aside, isn’t it interesting how Trump’s almost insanely hawkish demeanor thus far has actually earned him some new found respect among many in the DC establishment? Reagan’s anti-Soviet rhetoric was considered a political liability by the US ruling class in the early 1980s, but Trump’s respectful comments about Vladimir Putin made him unfit for office as far as the Democrats, Neocons, and most media outlets were concerned.

But back to the point of this post…

If we look at what Reagan actually did:

  1. Talked a lot of shit about the USSR (Russia)
  2. Bombed an Arab country (In his case Libya), but never did anything further
  3. Put a small number of Marines into an Arab country (Lebanon, and then pulled them out after a bunch of them were killed).
  4. Spend a ton of money on weapons.

Trump’s basically done those 4 things.  And make no mistake these were all really bad things with both Reagan and Trump*  But that was pretty much it with Reagan.  He really wasn’t a war president.  He invaded Granada which took a few hours, but that didn’t escalate into anything serious.  At any rate, I think Trump can probably avoid sending troops into a tiny Caribbean island.

Image result for reagan gorbachev

Let’s just hope Trump, like Reagan, ends up making friends with Russia (like he promised repeatedly during his campaign).  Let’s hope his bombing of Syria and Afghanistan was the end of those interventions, and he let’s the US gracefully bow out in defeat.  And let’s hope the troops he’s sent to Syria get pulled out.  And maybe we’ll be lucky and it won’t take over 200 dead marines for him to do it.  And I obviously don’t want increased military spending, but I’m guessing the price tag on a new aircraft carrier named U.S.S. Donald trump will be less costly than a full scale war.

It’s amazing to think that from about 1975 until the Bush Dynasty assumed power in 1989 and immediately invaded Panama, then Iraq, and then Somalia, the United States was more or less at Peace.  At least compared to the 1990s and certainly compared to the post 9/11 21st century.

Trump could still return us to a less bellicose foreign policy and let us relax on that front. We’ve got enough problems in this country, that we don’t need to be debating who should rule Ukraine, or Syria, or some islands in the Indian ocean as if it’s any business of the average American.  The people that voted for him certainly didn’t do so because they wanted to fight North Korea.

I’m losing faith that this “return to normalcy” can happen.  But I still see a small glimmer of hope.  However, it is fading fast.

*I would like to point out that I think the Soviet regime was horrible and communism is/was a very bad political and economic system.  So I don’t have a problem with the president expressing that as Reagan did.  I just don’t believe the Cold War, NATO, Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, etc. contributed to the security of the United States.  They were all a waste of money and lives as far as average Americans were concerned.  Ronnie should have been more worried about what was in the interests of United States citizens and less obsessed with his crusade to destroy the Evil Empire.  Regardless of how badly the Soviet regime treated its citizens, they weren’t suicidal and could have been dealt with like other world powers. The US didn’t have to constantly be on the brink of nuclear war in the twentieth century, and we don’t need to be now either.