Bradley Manning did not “aid the enemy”

A government judge decided that posting documents on the internet exposing war crimes and other embarrassing state department double dealing is not treason.  Many civil libertarians are celebrating this as a victory that will keep investigative journalism alive.

But Obama’s handlers have learned from Nixon’s mistakes.  Bradley Manning will not be the next Daniel Ellsberg.  He will be locked away in a government dungeon probably until long after Bush and Obama are dead.  He will not be allowed to talk to the press and will be largely forgotten.  I’m sure CNN will have moved on to Syria or the next phony racial crime by this weekend.

The Bradley Manning affair remains a warning to would be whistle blowers who currently work for the Empire.  You may not be hanged for treason, but you will be tortured and locked up for the rest of your life.

My advice?  Don’t work for the Empire in the first place.  Always assume the government puppets you see on TV are lying because they always are.

George Zimmerman is innocent. Move on.

This propaganda piece by the Associated Press is a good representation of all that is wrong with coverage of this George Zimmerman story.

The Florida case has become a flashpoint in separate but converging national debates over self-defense laws, guns, and race relations.

There is no debate going on here.  This is just the Democratic Party telling everyone what to think and being echoed by the media.  This AP article that starts off telling us there’s a debate going on, then proceeds to talk about 100 rallies in support of Trayvon Martin, quotes Al Sharpton and Martin’s mother, and then says Eric Holder is investigating whether Zimmerman can be charged for Civil Rights violations.  Where’s the debate?  I guess no one disagrees with the Democrats and the race hustlers on this.

The AP also continues to misinform the public that this case was about “stand your ground laws.”  Of course it wasn’t.  That law was not used by Zimmerman’s defense to justify his actions.  Based on the best available evidence which a jury used to acquit Zimmerman, he was attacked and defended himself.  He didn’t have the option of running away or whatever they’re saying he should have done.  So I guess according to Sharpton or Holder, if a black man attacks you, you better just shut up and take it.  Otherwise you’re violating his civil rights.  Hopefully you won’t be killed.

At least the AP isn’t calling Zimmerman a “white Hispanic” like their counterparts at the New York Times.  The guy’s about as white as Barack Obama.  Next time a Hispanic kills another Hispanic, are they going to as far as to call that white on Hispanic crime?  Or will the NYT just chalk that up to the violent white on white epidemic plaguing this nation?

I’m not entirely sympathetic to Zimmerman.  It seems to me he was probably a busy body who unnecessarily took the defense of his whole neighborhood as his responsibility.  Then he got a little power rush from it and kind of went looking for trouble.  But there is no evidence at all that he was racist (He’s part black for god’s sake) or that he murdered anyone.  The idea that the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he attacked and murdered Martin is just a flat out lie by anyone suggesting it.

Let me break this so called Zimmerman “debate” down for you:

Democrats: The public does not have the right to own guns or defend themselves. They should cower in their homes and pray to Obama that the cops will protect them.  The only reason blacks commit crimes at higher rates than other races is because the government isn’t giving them enough money and because whites are racists.  The Republicans block efforts to ban guns and help blacks because they represent rich white racists.

Republicans: No Opinion.

Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, and other assorted race hustlers: Every time a black person is killed by someone they consider a non-black, this is evidence of white racism.  The Democrats need to pass more laws to protect blacks, and anyone who disagrees is racist.

The Media: Repeat everything the Democrats and Al Sharpton have to say. Ignore all evidence that strays from their narrative.

If you’re an ordinary person, here is what you should do to contribute to this debate:

Black people: TV says you should be outraged so go out and black traffic and chant mindlessly.  If a few of you cause some property damage, that’s justified because you’re doing it for social justice.  Plus it will give Obama an excuse to increase the police state to settle the unrest he helped cause.  Then maybe he can steal white people’s guns.

White people: Apologize to blacks for Zimmerman or else shut the fuck up.

HispanicsYou’re an oppressed minority when Democrats want your vote.  But you may also be evil white racists if that suits the narrative so in this case shut up.  But next time Congress votes on an immigration bill, go out and protest (i.e. block traffic) and demand “justice” for your “race”.

AsiansThis doesn’t concern you, but you should quietly agree with the blacks on this.

Obama vs. King George

Since we’re supposed to be celebrating the Declaration of Independence today, let’s see how Obama stacks up against the tyrant King George III:

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. I suppose most of these “offices” were created by his predecessors, but he has certainly used the EPA, TSA, NSA, IRS, among other federal agencies to harass, spy, and steal from the American people.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.  The legislature certainly consents to standing armies, but Obama uses these armies to wage war without bothering to ask Congress.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:  Depends on how you look at this I guess. He occasionally signs onto UN treaties, but that’s not really the issue since it’s mainly for show.  He doesn’t expect the Senate to ratify them. What’s more relevant to this grievance of Tom Jefferson, is Obama’s attempts to force states to comply with his gun laws despite having no real authority on the matter in the Constitution or by any laws passed by Congress.

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: He’s not really guilty of this, but he does continue to restrict trade and makes it completely impossible with some countries such as Cuba.

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:  The whole idea that he can “regulate” carbon means he can tax our energy supply as much as he wants without any input from Congress.

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by JuryBradly Manning was held for 3 years before trial.  Plus there’s Guantanamo Bay which he famously promised to close.  And let’s not forget Obama claims the right to kill anyone, anywhere, without evidence.

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.  Congress has become increasingly irrelevant. Today the Executive Branch Bureaucracy holds the real power.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. I guess it would be the people of Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia that would have a gripe here.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. I think this kind of describes all recent American presidents pretty well.